Archive for August, 2009

Paths of the Seas

Sunday, August 30th, 2009

Christian oceanographer Matthew Maury mapped the seas.

Christian oceanographer Matthew Maury mapped the seas.

Matthew Maury believed the Bible. He read in Psalms 8 and 107 of “paths in the seas.” His attitude was “If God’s word says there are paths in the seas, they will be found.” Having circumnavigated the globe before he was thirty, he was familiar with ocean currents, tides and winds.

His break came when he was given a post considered a sinecure: Superintendent of the Depot of Charts and Instruments in Washington, D.C. He found many old logs gathering dust and saw the chance to convert them into maps of winds and currents. He also solicited information from captains world-wide, promising them free publications in return. Millions of his forms were returned to the Depot, enabling him to revise and update maps, and advise the entire world on shipping lanes. He advocated many farsighted advances which are documented in my book Scientists of Faith.

Like many scientists before and after him, Maury’s Christian faith played an integral part in advancing knowledge. He is an example of why thoughtful faith should not be disparaged in scientific circles.

Appendix by Design

Sunday, August 23rd, 2009

Diagram showing the appendix in a human.

Diagram showing the appendix in a human.

The appendix is still erroneously reported in some textbooks as proof of evolution. This traces back to Darwin, who called it a vestigal organ—the remnant of a previously-existing organ which evolution had outdated. Darwin thought it was all that was left of a larger bowel called a cecum.

Evidence has mounted against this evolutionary proposal. Studies since Darwin’s day show that 70% of rodents and mammals have groups with appendices—including several which have the larger cecum bowel, which raises the question, what is their appendix a vestige of? Furthermore, appendices appear in species which are unrelated by evolution. How and why did the same organ appear in unrelated species? Did evolution strike in the same way twice? What are the odds of that?

Actually the appendix is now thought to serve a unique and necessary function. The bowel needs certain bacteria to function properly. If these are wiped out, they must be repopulated for the health of the host. This led Maryland researchers to propose that the appendix serves as a “safe haven” for such bacteria and allows the re-population of these benign symbiotic forms in their hosts. Thus the appendix turns out to be beneficial and there is more than a hint of good design.

But what about appendicitis? Again this turns out to be a function of changes in human society, which have set it up for inflammation, rather than faulty design in the organ.

Retrograde Planet

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

Imaginary planet.

Imaginary planet.

Almost every one of the more than 300 planets so far discovered orbits its star in the direction the star rotates. This has to do with the way planets form. According to the British Wide Area Search for Planets, working in collaboration the the Geneva observatory, they have discovered the first planet to orbit in a retrograde manner—opposite of its star’s rotation.

The star and its planet are about 1,000 light years from earth. The team who discovered the planet theorize that its unusual motion is owing to a near-collision with some large body. The planet is also bloated, probably because of an eccentric orbit that brings it quite close to its star at times.

The point of this is that every new discovery shows just how unlikely the stable orbit and just-right conditions of our own earth are, suggesting the hand of a designer in its preparation and maintenance for the support of human life.

Book Review: A Step Farther Out

Sunday, August 9th, 2009

Pournelles ever-timely essays

Pournelle's ever-timely essays

Jerry Pournelle’s essays, A Step Farther Out, were published as a book in 1979—thirty years ago. A bit late for a review, you say? Do you belong to a procrastinators club? No and no. My justification for reviewing this “old” book is two-fold. One, I just ran across it; and two, the themes of its opening essays are so timely they could have been written for today.

Now I am going to confess that I have read only the first third of the book. The remaining essays may turn out to be dogs (although I doubt it), but the opening essays are electrifying.

In “Survival with Style” and “A Blueprint for Survival” Pournelle points out the doomsday mentality of American intellectuals and the danger of losing our nerve. He shows that our problems are soluble if we think big and allow innovation.

I was especially interested in his defiance of the Club of Rome’s doom-and-gloom. Not only are those guys wrong on almost every testable count, but their solutions point directly to the ten-headed dragon-state of Revelation. Pournelle saw straight through them.

Unfortunately, we seem to be taking the path Pournelle begged us to avoid: we lost our nerve. We are following the nay-sayers of the Club of Rome. Pournelle was calling us to faith—faith that with clear thinking, big dreams and hard work we could triumph over our obstacles. As a Christian I see those virtues springing from trust in God (which is why intellectuals by and large have no vision; they have jettisoned God).

Not many looks at social issues hold up so well as Pournelle’s. I rather think every such book ought to be reviewed in thirty years. We’d see then who were our Wormtongues and who talked straight.

Mind Reading Becoming More Scientific

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of a human brain.

MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of a human brain.

Research at Rutgers and UCLA is enabling scientists to “read” the mind. When people perform selected tasks, their brains tend to alter functional MRI (fMRI) images in predictable ways. By studying control images of subjects known to be performing one or another of eight actions, the researchers can then predict which action another subject is performing based on an fMRI. They guess right 80% of the time (chance would be 13%). Eventually, researchers hope to use fMRI to determine whether a person is lying or telling truth.

This research is still a far cry from real mind reading. True mind reading would be to know someone’s thoughts and motives the way the Bible says God can. However, the movement of science toward being able to do with crude mechanical apparatus what God is said to do through spirit goes some way toward confirming the plausibility of the Biblical claim. Allowing for a moment the hypothesis that God designed the brain, it would be surprising if he could not provide himself some means of retrieving information from it.