Archive for the ‘Biology’ Category

Optical Illusions

Sunday, September 20th, 2009
This optical illusion should squirm under your gaze.

This optical illusion should squirm under your gaze.

Friday I was looking for 3D optical illusions for an art class. I found a web full of wonderful 2D illusions in the process. The ones that intrigued me the most were those that appear in motion because of the automatic responses of the brain.

To know theoretically that the brain is constantly making calculations unnoticed in the background to process the input of my eyes is one thing, but to see its actual attempts to adjust to the impossible—the illusions wiggling and squirming—is another. It points up what an amazing organ we are dealing with.

The system is so complex it begs for a designer. What is more, it serves a higher purpose, giving fair warning that not everything is as we see. Now why should nature build a metaphysical lesson into our seeing process for us?

P.S. If you know who deserves credit for the illusion above, let me know.

Biological Wisdom

Monday, September 7th, 2009

The design of DNA from the U.S. government's genome project.

The design of DNA from the U.S. government's genome project.

Gerald L. Schroeder, in The Hidden Face of God, discusses the wisdom scientists are finding as they dig into the hidden workings of biology (and other sciences). For example, a few strands of DNA, invisible to the eye, carry sufficient information that a complete human being, with all its different cells and capabilities, can form from their blueprint. Or consider our thinking process and the working of nerves which carry information to the brain, a system which is exquisitely simple on one level but extraordinarily complex on another, and certainly indicative of brilliant design to anyone without a closed mind.

I find intriguing Schroeder’s continual references to the wisdom of nature which reminds him of Old Testament wisdom references, including Proverbs 3:19—”With wisdom God founded the world.”

I would take it a step farther, however, and say that the most sensible explanation of everything that exists (including Christian history, the cross, and the resurrection), is found in the writings of Paul, who says that Christ is the wisdom of God (1 Corinthians 1:22-24) and that it was through him and for him all things were created, visible and invisible (Colossians 1:16ff).

Appendix by Design

Sunday, August 23rd, 2009

Diagram showing the appendix in a human.

Diagram showing the appendix in a human.

The appendix is still erroneously reported in some textbooks as proof of evolution. This traces back to Darwin, who called it a vestigal organ—the remnant of a previously-existing organ which evolution had outdated. Darwin thought it was all that was left of a larger bowel called a cecum.

Evidence has mounted against this evolutionary proposal. Studies since Darwin’s day show that 70% of rodents and mammals have groups with appendices—including several which have the larger cecum bowel, which raises the question, what is their appendix a vestige of? Furthermore, appendices appear in species which are unrelated by evolution. How and why did the same organ appear in unrelated species? Did evolution strike in the same way twice? What are the odds of that?

Actually the appendix is now thought to serve a unique and necessary function. The bowel needs certain bacteria to function properly. If these are wiped out, they must be repopulated for the health of the host. This led Maryland researchers to propose that the appendix serves as a “safe haven” for such bacteria and allows the re-population of these benign symbiotic forms in their hosts. Thus the appendix turns out to be beneficial and there is more than a hint of good design.

But what about appendicitis? Again this turns out to be a function of changes in human society, which have set it up for inflammation, rather than faulty design in the organ.

Mind Reading Becoming More Scientific

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of a human brain.

MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of a human brain.

Research at Rutgers and UCLA is enabling scientists to “read” the mind. When people perform selected tasks, their brains tend to alter functional MRI (fMRI) images in predictable ways. By studying control images of subjects known to be performing one or another of eight actions, the researchers can then predict which action another subject is performing based on an fMRI. They guess right 80% of the time (chance would be 13%). Eventually, researchers hope to use fMRI to determine whether a person is lying or telling truth.

This research is still a far cry from real mind reading. True mind reading would be to know someone’s thoughts and motives the way the Bible says God can. However, the movement of science toward being able to do with crude mechanical apparatus what God is said to do through spirit goes some way toward confirming the plausibility of the Biblical claim. Allowing for a moment the hypothesis that God designed the brain, it would be surprising if he could not provide himself some means of retrieving information from it.

Artificial Intelligence and the Eye

Sunday, July 12th, 2009

The marvellous human eye.

The marvelous human eye.

Artificial means something created by human art rather than occurring in nature. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a computer program designed by humans to handle problems creatively, that is in the manner that the higher animals or humans would handle them.

An enormous amount of brainwork goes into successful AI developments. And the most efficient solutions generally come from the study of nature. For example, Boston College researchers Hao Jiang and Stella X. Yu recently revealed an improved method for getting computers to recognize moving objects.

Not surprisingly, their method more closely imitates the working of the human eye and brain than previous methods had.

When the most intelligent minds in our labs find it necessary to model their hardware and program designs on nature’s designs (and still can only roughly approximate nature’s successful designs), one is compelled to consider the overwhelming likelihood that nature itself has an intelligent designer of far superior ability.

Designer Junk

Sunday, May 31st, 2009

RNA excerpt. Courtesy of Wikipedia.

RNA excerpt. Courtesy of Wikipedia.

If life arose by chance, one would expect to find lots of “mistakes” in organisms— vestigal organs and junk DNA, for example. Prominent atheists have made just this case.

However, greater knowledge of the cell’s workings has shown that much that was once considered junk DNA is absolutely essential to the function of the cell. Such was the case with microRNAs, short snippets of RNA that not long ago were thought to be garbage, but recently found to regulate genes.

Now this “junk” holds out the long-term prospect of cancer treatment. Just a few weeks ago Johns Hopkins researchers published a paper showing that microRNAs are set into production by cell density, although somehow this function breaks down in cancers. The hope is that research will show how to repair, restore or replicate the crucial function of microRNAs in the fight against cancers.

The more that so-called junk DNA and RNA are found to be intricately involved in cell function and regulation, the weaker the atheist argument grows and the stronger the case for a designer becomes.

Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Human embryonic stem cell colony. Courtesy of Wikipedia.

Human embryonic stem cell colony. Courtesy of Wikipedia.

Recent political campaigns in the United States have presented embryonic stem cell research in frenzied terms. TV ads presented emotional appeals based on sad cases of individuals suffering incurable diseases. Anyone who opposed such research was made to look like an uncaring villain or troglodyte. Never mind the religious and moral arguments against destroying human embryos to sustain the research. Never mind the real alternatives.

The importance of stem cells lies in their ability to morph into other cells; the hope is to develop healthy strains of cells that can replace faulty in humans. Generally, the major media said little about alternatives.

Yet all along, real advances were being made in adult stem cell research, and such research did not require the destruction of an unborn child. Children have been treated for leukemia, blood and bone diseases using “adult” and placental cells. Doctors in Spain recently grew a replacement trachea for a woman using her own cells. In fact, the success rate for adult and placental cells seems to be far better than that for embryonic stem cells.

The main drawback of using adult cells was that viruses had to be used to create induced pluripotent stem cells—essentially adult cells reprogrammed to behave like other types of cells. Since such cells were not considered completely safe for use in humans, a better method was desired. Now both U.S. and Canadian researchers have succeeded in producing induced pluripotent stem cells using virus-free techniques. This is good news, and holds out the potential for adult cells to completely displace embryonic stem cells.

In contending for embryonic stem cell research, the media would do a real service by being honest about the alternatives and showing respect for the moral and ethical concerns which arise out of the destruction of embryos.

Tie a Knot Blindfolded

Sunday, March 22nd, 2009

A lot goes into tying a knot behind one's back.

A lot goes into tying a knot behind one's back.

A few weeks back my wife was modeling a new outfit she had bought. As she slipped on its vest, I realized it had belt-like strips that had to be tied behind. I expected her to turn to me and ask me to tie them for her, but instead, she reached back and, without being able to see what she was doing, knotted the strings herself.

That incident, seemingly so insignificant, struck me forcibly. What incredible abilities we have! Think of all the bones and muscles, nerves and mental imagery that have to coordinate together flawlessly to make possible the feat of tying a shoestring knot behind your back.

Am I supposed to believe this came about by chance? It took enormous ingenuity to devise a system to tie baling string in a combine. Can I believe that the ability of my wife to tie a bow behind her back was any less the product of a master designer?

The Foundation and Science

Sunday, February 15th, 2009

 

Nova remnant in the Z Camelopardalis double star system. Image courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech.

Nova remnant in the Z Camelopardalis double star system. Image courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech.

One of the top-ten all time great Sci-Fi books on almost any list is Isaac Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy. As a story it is superb. As science, well…

Asimov has swarms of humanity living in star-crowded regions of space where, to put it mildly, earth-like planets, and therefore life, would be highly unlikely. While reading (and re-reading) the Foundation series, the thought of excess radiation in galactic centers used to gnaw at the back of my mind, making it hard for me to suspend disbelief as completely as I could wish.

Today, many other obstacles to an Asimovian cosmos suggest themselves: the dustiness of the central galactic areas, the likelihood of perturbation of planetary orbits in so crowded a region (almost guaranteed to abort the formation of an earth-like planet), and above all the greedy black holes at galactic centers.

All told, it is highly improbable life would flourish in the busy centers of galaxies.

Since carbon is the sole element suitable to base life on (silicon, the only other candidate, doesn’t inspire much enthusiasm), we can safely say higher life forms will probably need an environment hospitable to carbon-based life—in other words, an earth-like planet.

A few years ago, for a school project (which, unfortunately I have misplaced), I made some conservative calculations of the chance of there being another earth-like planet in our galaxy. I began by eliminating from consideration all stars in multiple star systems (or in densely populated regions which would likely disrupt the stable planetary orbit needed for the survival of higher forms of life). This left me with less than half the starting population of stars, since binaries and other multiples make up the majority of stars we see. I then applied other factors.

At that time, about 100 extra-solar planets had been discovered. Because of eccentric orbits, star types, and masses, not one could conceivably support life as we know it. I took this to be characteristic of the galaxy as a whole, and estimated conservatively that perhaps one star in 50 might have a rocky planet with the carbon and trace elements necessary for life. We have now found almost 350 extra-solar planets and still not found a truly earth-like one.

privileged planetThis still left a huge pool of stars which could conceivably possess earth-like planets. But when I began to demand other essentials of life—water, for instance—the number dwindled. In the end, I decided I’d be surprised if there were another planet like good ol’ earth in our galaxy. The DVD Privileged Planet takes just a few necessities of life and leaves us looking at odds of one in 100 trillion. Since there are under 250 billion stars in our galaxy, those odds are pretty steep. They are also too conservative. Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe has assembled a list of over one hundred essentials for higher life, which, if factored out, would make the chances of another earth-like planet infinitismal. The earth is such a special place that its development by a superior power seems almost proven.

So while the Foundation Trilogy makes a great yarn, one which I will almost certainly re-read yet again, Sci-Fi writers today need to readjust their premisses.